Polling Rate 125Hz vs 1000hz @ 144hz Monitor @ 144 FPS
Aug 26, 2020 · EastCoast said: 1000hz polling rate is only achieved maintaining a certain level of consistent movement.In which the polling rate decreases the slower you move the mouse. If true, in FPS games this mouse movement may not reach 1000Hz polling rate. True, but it doesn't take super high speed movement as u might be thinking.
ASUS ROG Swift 500Hz Gaming Monitor | Overclock.net
May 24, 2022 · Overclocking a panel can reduce response times at the cost of color accuracy, and TN is the fastest of the LCD panels. However, you need the panel to respond to color/brightness changes in less than 2ms to fully utilize 500Hz, half that if you are using BFI. The only panel type that can accomplish that is OLED.
Consensus on 500 Hz vs 1000 Hz polling | Overclock.net
Nov 25, 2014 · well at the end of the day 125 Hz is 8 ms between the updates and 500 Hz is 2ms while 1000 Hz is 1 ms. I doubt you can really tell as humans have a reaction time between 100-300 ms anyway. But on many mice 500 Hz has been much more stable in the past so due to that fact many have avoided 1000 Hz.
1000Hz v. 500Hz, rawness or inaccuracy? Some interesting data
Jun 22, 2015 · After acquiring a 144 Hz monitor and becoming a strong advocate for minimal input latency, I started experimenting with 1000 Hz versus 500 Hz mouse polling rate. While there's been much debate between the two, I came to believe that the main criteria ** for making this decision is whether your system is suitable for accurate 1000 Hz polling.
500hz [IPS] -- VS -- MSI MPG 271QRX- 360hz - [QD-OLED]
Apr 30, 2024 · B. Bobby55 Discussion starter. 24 posts · Joined 2024. #1 · Apr 30, 2024. Im striving for fastest response times between mouse and keyboard strokes to screen. My work is offline technical drawings, so no internet latency is factored, and non-gaming intended. The MSI MPG 271QRX- 360hz is around £1000, the AW2524HF - 500hz around £400...
1000 Hz and 125 Hz - whats the difference? - Overclock.net
Apr 21, 2013 · It's not only about the response of the mouse, it's about the smoothness too. You'll have a more smooth pattern at an higher polling rate, and the difference between 125 hz and 500 hz is highly noticiable in term of smoothness, for me at least. the difference between 500hz and 1000hz is hardly noticiable for me tho. LAWL.
Competitive Gaming 1000 hz vs 500 hz polling rate
Jul 24, 2009 · Originally Posted by AnDry115 Hi, I am using my Logitech G400 for about 2months now. What i've noticed is, that i use 125Hz, and when i read about it on google..its better to use 500/1000Hz for gaming, because 125Hz is a little bit jumpy..and it realy is..
1000/500/125Hz comparison with video - Overclock.net
Dec 30, 2014 · Quote: Originally Posted by Dreyka. The difference between 125Hz and 500Hz is 6ms. The difference between 500Hz and 1000Hz is 1ms and the difference between the 500Hz and 1000Hz frames looks marginal. The difference between 500 Hz and 1000 Hz is 100%, absolute numbers can easily give a false impression.
Competitive Gaming 1000 hz vs 500 hz polling rate
Oct 30, 2016 · 144hz screen, 1000hz mouse minimizes this for now (almost exactly ~7 polls per refresh) while 144hz screen paired with 500hz mouse is a pretty bad offender. I don't believe in "good enough"~!! 240hz / gsync / low persistence is AWESOME. 5 …
Competitive Gaming 1000 hz vs 500 hz polling rate - Overclock.net
Jan 11, 2013 · There is no real advantage to it. So my conclusion is to go with the most stable polling rate with the best performance which is 500 Hz for all my mice. I do. 1000hz tends to be a bit less restricted to hand movement. 500hz (or lower steps) will always hit a …