Apr 29, 2014 · David Leon Riley belonged to the Lincoln Park gang of San Diego, California. On August 2, 2009, he and others opened fire on a rival gang member driving past them.

Jan 17, 2014 · Riley v. California: Considering the significant privacy interests involved, the police are generally not permitted to search digital information on a cell phone seized from an …

Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell …

Mar 22, 2017 · Riley, along with and similarly situated Wurie, petitioned the Supreme Court in a consolidated case. The Supreme Court held that the government may not conduct a …

Jun 25, 2014 · SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus RILEY v. CALIFORNIA certiorari to the court of appeal of california, fourth appellate district, division one No. 13–132. …

Nov 10, 2014 · Indeed, the Court has used a similar balancing approach to issue several less pro-privacy opinions in recent years. Riley may have set forth a categorical rule only because of …

Jul 20, 2025 · Explore the Supreme Court's reasoning in Riley v. California, a case that applied Fourth Amendment protections to digital data and limited warrantless cell phone searches.

California ... Holding: The police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested.

May 2, 2023 · Riley v. California was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2014, which dealt with the issue of whether the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution allows …

Police must generally obtain a warrant before searching digital information on arrestee’s cell phone. In two cases (one state, one federal), the Court considered whether police may …