The Supreme Court case comes as several GOP-led states have embarked on rare mid-decade redistricting fights, in attempt to ...
2don MSNOpinion
Supreme Court won't torch Voting Rights Act. But this dated practice has to go. | Opinion
The Supreme Court should make it clear that racial gerrymandering is illegal, even if it is in the name of racial justice.
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether the use of race in drawing a majority-minority district to comply with the Voting ...
The court's conservative majority could invalidate the section of the Voting Rights Act aimed at ensuring minority voters are ...
11don MSN
Democrats Have One Brutal Path to Survival if the Supreme Court Kills the Voting Rights Act
Congress could become even less diverse, as racial minorities in blue states would have fewer opportunities to elect the ...
The conservative justices signaled they could undercut the law's Section 2, which bars voting maps that would result in ...
A Supreme Court case over Louisiana's congressional map could determine the future of Voting Rights Act protections against ...
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their ...
If the court rules quickly enough in a key voting rights case, it could allow yet another round of partisan redistricting ...
In a dispute over a Louisiana voting map, the justices grappled with whether there should be a time limit on using race as a ...
Rachel Richards and her supporters contend that Referendum 1 seeking to raise the threshold for changing the use of open space is undemocratic or minority rule. This contention is deliberately ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results